<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amazon E-Commerce Services</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.codercorp.com/blog/php/amazon-e-commerce-services.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.codercorp.com/blog/php/amazon-e-commerce-services.html</link>
	<description>Everything java</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 06:25:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.codercorp.com/blog/php/amazon-e-commerce-services.html/comment-page-1#comment-564</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 22:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codercorp.com/blog/?p=5#comment-564</guid>
		<description>I played around with S3 using jets3t.  The Amazon APIs seems to be pretty straight-forward but the price (IMO) is about 10x too high.  It seems fairly cheap at first glance but if youre someone like me who may want to store 100GB+ of lifelong collections of music, pictures, videos, etc, as well as share them with friends, it will cost you as much money as a gym membership.  And knowing that amazon uses cheap 2nd hand hardware..  Im looking at moving to rackspace&#039;s cloud file solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I played around with S3 using jets3t.  The Amazon APIs seems to be pretty straight-forward but the price (IMO) is about 10x too high.  It seems fairly cheap at first glance but if youre someone like me who may want to store 100GB+ of lifelong collections of music, pictures, videos, etc, as well as share them with friends, it will cost you as much money as a gym membership.  And knowing that amazon uses cheap 2nd hand hardware..  Im looking at moving to rackspace&#8217;s cloud file solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

